Molly Wakeling:
by blending with the original, they can look quite natural.
Does "natural" looking include simulating the proper colors?
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
Molly Wakeling: Does "natural" looking include simulating the proper colors? |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
I've got Astronomy Tools action in Photoshop 2025 on Macbook Pro running Sequoia 15.5. Happy to run a quick star spikes on one or two of your images, if we can work out a way to share them back and forth, to show exactly what it can do. I don't use it a lot, but sometimes "the general public" like star spike versions ;-)
|
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
I created a manual method for adding spikes - you have to add them to each star you want, but you are in complete control. My method is based on using Photopea.com, a free Photoshop-like online editor, but Photoshop or any other photo editor works too. Here's my article: https://remoteastrophotography.com/2021/11/creating-star-spikes-reliable-method |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
Erik Westermann: The problem with this approach and others like it is that it doesn't produce diffraction spikes. They are just monochromatic spikes on the stars that, in my opinion, look terrible. Diffraction is an optical effect that forms a sinc() function that scales inversely with the thickness of the spider vanes and the wavelength so it is quite a colorful effect. Realistic diffraction spikes can be generated mathematically but the easiest way to get it right is to use light as the computer and you do that by stringing orthogonal straight wires through the entrance pupil. John |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Yes, there is one. StarSpikes Pro 2 This software is only available on Windows, I believe. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
John Hayes:Molly Wakeling: No, it doesn't quite go that far. Rather, the first image out of the spike adder has rather fat, fake-looking spikes, but blending with the original makes them thinner and more realistic. I mainly only see color in very bright stars, so that part is missing, but probably not especially noticeable to most viewers. |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
Use fishing line or thin wire in front of your objective. Definitely more natural and appealing than falsely adding them in post.
|