iPolar camera accuracy on iOptron CEM 120 iOptron CEM120 · AstroRBA · ... · 9 · 567 · 0

AstroRBA 4.98
...
· 
·  Share link
I am using an iOptron CEM 120 with an EDGE 14 and ASI6200MM and an Innovations Foresight XM On Axis Guider (guide cam is an ASI0171MC).

I've polar aligned with the iPolar camera and I'm perfectly level on a permanent pier with good RA and Dec balance.

I'm shooting at F11 and notice trails when pointing *east* even on 30 second test shots (without guiding) - When guiding (PHD) with the ONAG the Dec is good but the RA is poor with occasional big jumps in no particular direction.

BUT - the funny thing is that pointing *west* all is pretty stable….

Has anyone experienced something similar ?
Like
andreatax 9.89
...
· 
·  Share link
Sure it ain't the iPolar fault. Or polar alignment either as long you're about there. More likely you need to rebalance the load balancing to be RA heavy on both sides of pier.
Like
daywalker
...
· 
·  Share link
Its just a camera/lens.Its what you and your software does with them to make an accurate polar alignment.
Which software did you use to carry out the polar alignment.Ive never used the actual ipolar software so i cant comment on that if that is what your asking.
What polar alignment error did you achieve at the end of your polar alignment process
phd all configured correctly?(sometime when you change your setup you can easily carry over wrong setting)
Sounds like a general guiding troubleshooting exercise to me…

i use ipolars with phd/INDI .Very convenient having it there built into the mounts.
Like
Shinpah 1.51
...
· 
·  Share link
In practice I've found the ipolar accurate down to about 1-2 arcminutes based on PHD2's declination drift calculations from the logs.

2 arcminutes of PA error will give you about 0.3 arcseconds of drift at declination 0 in 30 seconds. This is 150% your image scale at 4000mm~ focal length.

This is basically to be expected with unguided imaging at extreme focal lengths
Like
andreatax 9.89
...
· 
·  Share link
In practice I've found the ipolar accurate down to about 1-2 arcminutes based on PHD2's declination drift calculations from the logs.

2 arcminutes of PA error will give you about 0.3 arcseconds of drift at declination 0 in 30 seconds. This is 150% your image scale at 4000mm~ focal length.

This is basically to be expected with unguided imaging at extreme focal lengths

If the OP is pointing "East" I doubt that it is likely that the scope is pointing at 0 Dec.
Like
andreatax 9.89
...
· 
·  Share link
Never mind the seeing is got to be equal or better than 0.3" to notice any drift.
Like
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
(deleted)
Edited ...
Like
AstroRBA 4.98
Topic starter
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
Excellent advice ! Many thanks ! I'll give it a whirl the next time out.
Like
astrospaceguide 2.41
...
· 
·  Share link
I have been running a CEM 120 EC version for about 3/4 of a year now and I have had to replace some boards on it.  My RA now is all crazy and won't search for zero position.  Anyway, I do like the mount, but the tips from Jim sound great.  I will say that I used the iPolar and found vastly different results when I jumped over to NINA to polar align.  I felt that the NINA polar alignment worked better as well each time, so I always use that and just capped off my ipolar and do not use anymore.  But I will second Jim's thread on making sure it's all level and slightly heavy on one side.  I also find better results bumping aggressiveness way down on the CEM 120 in PhD.
Like
AstroRBA 4.98
Topic starter
...
· 
·  Share link
4. For whatever reason, my mount tracks much better with just a little imbalance in both RA and DEC axes. The DEC due mainly to wind gusts I believe. 

5. In PhD2, experiment with your RA Threshold and Aggressiveness settings. I've had really good luck reducing both, so less error accumulates before a command is sent to the mount, but once sent, it is a small one (and more than one such gentle nudge is required ; 3 or 4 usually). I.e., Don't try to zero the error with one larger push. In general one should not see a corrective pulse in the opposite direction, but a smooth decline and nicely damped error reduction.


Hi Jim,

Just wondering regarding point 4; which way do you find the imbalance to help? Counterweight heavy or scope heavy? and regarding point 5; what threshold levels do you think work best? (I've experimented from 60 up but have you gone lower than that maybe?) I've also tried a variety of time intervals and I've determined 3 to 5 sec to be best BUT I think it should be possible to go 10 seconds plus on this mount with the right parameters?

Thanks in advance!

Pete
Like
 
Register or login to create to post a reply.