ZWO eaf settings for EdgeHD 8 Celestron EdgeHD 8" · Amit · ... · 8 · 288 · 0

akp88 2.11
...
· 
·  Share link
Hello EdgeHD 8 family,

I am a new member and owner of this beautiful telescope. I am thinking about putting the zwo eaf which currently sits on my 4in refractor. But I got very confused reading about the eaf on edgeHd  in various forums. 

I need help with figuring out the settings to use - 
1) setting zero ? Do i rotate the knob counterclockwise or clockwise? till it stops and i set that to zero?

2) Max or limit - rotate the other direction till it stops to find the Max?

3) Backlash- here i dont have a reference to see the actual engagement of the knob gears to find backlash. I read online to note star size change to find backlash but that seems not precise? How to go about backlash? 

or it would be great if anyone with edgeHD 8 + zwo eaf using asiair can post a snapshot of the setting to give me a starting point. This would be mighty helpful.

last question- what’s with the reverse mode? Do i just turn it on for edgeHD?
Like
MaxSpektro 0.00
...
· 
·  2 likes
·  Share link
This reply is not going to address your points directly, perhaps others can do so in detail. I used a ZWO EAF on my EdgeHD 8 for a short while but gave it up because there was too much backlash in the system to make autofocus easy to use. I suspect that most of the backlash was in the EdgeHD. I never attempted to run the EAF from one extreme of focus to the other, I set the focus for a nominal coarse focus and then worked incrementally from there. To achieve focus that way only requires a small percentage of the total focus travel.

I currently use a Primaluce Lab ESATTO 2 LP low-profile focuser, which was designed to work with the EdgeHD 8, and is a huge improvement over the EAF. It doesn’t use up much backfocus and autofocuses like a dream.  Also, coarse focus is easily achieved as the focus knob is freely available and the tension clutches can then be applied to reduce mirror movement. Probably wouldn’t work with an ASIAIR, though.
Like
huowa7 0.00
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
Hi,
1. There’s no absolute "zero" position on the focus knob itself—it’s just a reference point. You can set the EAF (Electronic Automatic Focuser) to zero at any time. From that reference point, you can command the EAF to move up to its maximum range (e.g., 60,000 steps).

Since the focus point depends on your setup (and it changes between using a camera or an eyepiece), you'll need to find focus manually. To do that, point your telescope at a distant object during the day, or a bright star at night. Then manually focus using either the knob or the EAF until the object is sharp.

Once you've found focus, you can assign that position any value you like in the EAF software. For example, I set mine to 10,000, which gives me flexibility to adjust focus both inward and outward (especially useful if I switch between a 0.7× reducer, no reducer, or a 2× Barlow).

If you're focusing on a star and your camera software supports real-time preview, it’s much easier: just slowly move the EAF while watching the star. You’ll see the donut shape of the out-of-focus star grow or shrink—your goal is to minimize that ring, and that tells you which direction to turn.

2. Does the Maximum or Minimum Position Matter?
Not really. In my experience, I’ve never hit the actual mechanical max or min of the focus knob—even when using a reducer or Barlow lens. The ZWO EAF, for example, can move well over 12,000 steps, which is plenty of range for most setups.

So don’t worry too much about the limits. As long as your telescope can reach focus with your current configuration, you’ll rarely (if ever) need to max out the EAF travel.

3. Once you’ve roughly found focus, it’s important to lock the EAF securely onto the focus knob—any slippage between them will throw off your EAF readings. After securing it, you can calibrate backlash using the following method:

Mark the knob and the EAF coupler with a piece of tape or marker so you can visually track movement.
From your control app, move the EAF 100 steps in one direction, then move it 100 steps back.
If the two marks realign, your backlash is essentially zero.
If they don’t, continue turning the EAF (same direction) until the marks align again.
The number of extra steps required is your backlash value.
Repeat the process a few times for consistency. Once you have a reliable value, enter it into your EAF software.
This ensures your autofocus routines and manual adjustments are accurate and repeatable.

Hope this is helpful!
Good luck and enjoy!

Peng
Like
huowa7 0.00
...
· 
·  Share link
Actually, backlash isn’t a critical issue if you’re using the autofocus function in ASIAIR—which I rely on every night as temperature changes and when switching filters. The software automatically determines the precise focus point for you (if you could have a rough focus point in place). I usally run 2–3 times autofoucs per night, and it’s usually enough to keep everything sharp. However, if you rely on manual focus, which is quite inconvenient compared with autofocus, you'd better to get a precise backlash.
Like
sam_d_Silva 0.00
...
· 
·  Share link
Agreed with @MaxSpektro  I also took it out and now I go all manual and do all fine tuning when needed.
Like
Paulinho 5.01
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
Hi, Amit.

I had the ZWO EAF on my EdgeHD 8 (C8) and it worked well enough, but I switched to the Esatto 2 LP – MaxSpektro is spot on with his comments.  It’s a beautiful piece of kit but it is pricy so maybe not a consideration for now.  Works flawlessly with NINA.

But back to the EAF.   I keep a log, and as best I can tell from my notes, the settings I ended up using on for the EAF on the C8 were as follows (NB: I use NINA, not ASIAIR but I expect the same parameters will apply):

·       Autofocus Step Size=250

·       Initial Sets = 4

·       Backlash compensation method = Overshoot

·       Backlash IN/OUT = 0/500

A note on Backlash.  For the C8, you need OUT set to something (not IN).  I tried smaller and larger values, but 500 worked on mine: anticlockwise needs to be the final move to deal with backlash on the C8 and this is the correct setting for that.

If it helps, I also use the Hyperbolic curve  fitting algorithm, which for me works better then the other options available in NINA – this may be a NINA thing, so you may need something else.

I hope that helps, Amit.

All the best.

Paul
Like
OklahomAstro 5.08
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
Paul Larkin:
Hi, Amit.

I had the ZWO EAF on my EdgeHD 8 (C8) and it worked well enough, but I switched to the Esatto 2 LP – MaxSpektro is spot on with his comments.  It’s a beautiful piece of kit but it is pricy so maybe not a consideration for now.  Works flawlessly with NINA.

But back to the EAF.   I keep a log, and as best I can tell from my notes, the settings I ended up using on for the EAF on the C8 were as follows (NB: I use NINA, not ASIAIR but I expect the same parameters will apply):

·       Autofocus Step Size=250

·       Initial Sets = 4

·       Backlash compensation method = Overshoot

·       Backlash IN/OUT = 0/500

A note on Backlash.  For the C8, you need OUT set to something (not IN).  I tried smaller and larger values, but 500 worked on mine: anticlockwise needs to be the final move to deal with backlash on the C8 and this is the correct setting for that.

If it helps, I also use the Hyperbolic curve  fitting algorithm, which for me works better then the other options available in NINA – this may be a NINA thing, so you may need something else.

I hope that helps, Amit.

All the best.

Paul

ASIair automatically calculates backlash compensation IN/OUT and method, Only adjustments you need to make (or in this case, can make) are the Step Size and interval of AF.

I use step size = 50, gives me laser sharp AF every time.

I'd advise every 30m to 1h per AF, since you can't lock the mirror when using an EAF.
Like
B_Wave 0.00
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
Hello Amit

Before I installed the AEF from ZWO to my Celestron Edge HD 8" I started to get a focus manually during day time by using the focus knob. After the AEF was fixed I used the hand controller and a bathimov mask to focus on some bright stars. Next I set this focus point to 30'000 and the step size to 150 and let the autofocuses do its job. During this process the focuser is turning counterclockwise indicated by the screws on the connector between the EAF and the Celestron.
When the focus point is found I checked one more time using the bathimov mask again. I didn't found great changes during the night but of course it's a good idea to check the focus from time to time.
Another important aspect is the collimation of the Celestron. This is also very important for the quality of our pictures. First it is a little bit annoying but it really helps!

Clear skies - Beat
Like
Prontor 0.00
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
Hola, Amit
A pesar de que no es lo ideal, puedes utilizar el EAF ZWO sin problema, yo lo tengo así desde hace más de tres años y funciona bien tanto con el Edge C8 a focal nominal como con el reductor de 0,7 x. El único problema es que el EAF no tiene la cantidad de pasos suficientes como para enfocar con el C8 cuyo desplazamieto del primario es muy extenso comparado con los refractores normales, por ello es indispensable primero lograr el foco manualmente y desde esa posición, el EAF ya te funcionará bien entre 200 y 300 pasos.
Like
 
Register or login to create to post a reply.