be73227d-9054-4373-83fb-75b30258c1a0.jpg
Attached is a screenshot of a friend who has nothing to do with astrophotography. She also no longer sees the account
Hello everyone
As it looks now, he was removed from Instagram 2 hours ago today I saw his account and now he can no longer be found. Others who are not in contact with him can no longer see the account, yesterday his blue tick was removed, I hope he did really been removed.
And I think it's great when we stick together like this, that's what makes this great community what it is in my opinion
Simone I believe his account is just deactivated at the moment. He does this from time to time when people expose him. He will deactivate his account and then come back in a few weeks.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
be73227d-9054-4373-83fb-75b30258c1a0.jpg
Attached is a screenshot of a friend who has nothing to do with astrophotography. She also no longer sees the account
Hello everyone
As it looks now, he was removed from Instagram 2 hours ago today I saw his account and now he can no longer be found. Others who are not in contact with him can no longer see the account, yesterday his blue tick was removed, I hope he did really been removed.
And I think it's great when we stick together like this, that's what makes this great community what it is in my opinion
Simone He does this, he deactivates and then reactivates once it is quiet. He also changes names. His previous user name was astrophotography22. We run AstroCreditHunters on IG and have been dealing with him for a while now.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Peter Goodhew:
Yes he's gone from Instagram! He is more than likely deactivated. He does this often.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Niklas:
Definitely a well adjusted individual 
I'd encourage people not to engage with trolls like this. Spread the word if you see someone stealing content, contact people directly and guide them to the reporting tool of the respective social media platform.
If someone wants to take the legal route, the person in question doesn't seem particularely careful with their personal data, as Instagram Verified requires a government ID. Even Instagram becomes responsive if a legal letter comes in. This is what we do on AstroCreditHunters on IG. We bring account like this to light, add them to a database, and have a “pinned” guide on the top of our feed that shows how to report through Instagram.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
be73227d-9054-4373-83fb-75b30258c1a0.jpg
Attached is a screenshot of a friend who has nothing to do with astrophotography. She also no longer sees the account
Hello everyone
As it looks now, he was removed from Instagram 2 hours ago today I saw his account and now he can no longer be found. Others who are not in contact with him can no longer see the account, yesterday his blue tick was removed, I hope he did really been removed.
And I think it's great when we stick together like this, that's what makes this great community what it is in my opinion
Simone
He does this, he deactivates and then reactivates once it is quiet. He also changes names. His previous user name was astrophotography22.
We run AstroCreditHunters on IG and have been dealing with him for a while now.
However with Andi's quoted link: https://www.instagram.com/p/CscD9yipugt/I assume that the link would still be the same irrespective of what or how many times he changes his name (when he reactivates it), is that correct? Or does he get a new link altogether?
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
be73227d-9054-4373-83fb-75b30258c1a0.jpg
Attached is a screenshot of a friend who has nothing to do with astrophotography. She also no longer sees the account
Hello everyone
As it looks now, he was removed from Instagram 2 hours ago today I saw his account and now he can no longer be found. Others who are not in contact with him can no longer see the account, yesterday his blue tick was removed, I hope he did really been removed.
And I think it's great when we stick together like this, that's what makes this great community what it is in my opinion
Simone
He does this, he deactivates and then reactivates once it is quiet. He also changes names. His previous user name was astrophotography22.
We run AstroCreditHunters on IG and have been dealing with him for a while now.
However with Andi's quoted link: https://www.instagram.com/p/CscD9yipugt/
I assume that the link would still be the same irrespective of what or how many times he changes his name (when he reactivates it), is that correct? Or does he get a new link altogether?
I’m assuming it changes as his IG had conor_woods at the end of the URL
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
I think he's really banned from Instagram if an account deactivates itself, he can still be found by other users, you just can't see the pictures anymore and you can't see the followers either. Since his account can no longer be found and that also with accounts that have nothing to do with this matter (he cannot block all Instagram users:happy-2  , he will be deleted. Of course it can be that it appears under a new name, of course this cannot be prevented, just as it cannot be prevented that pictures are stolen and used without consent, so be careful :-) In the sense of all clear skies Simone
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
I still see him on IG:  |
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
we are all just a bag of particles governed by the laws of physics, which means we have no free will. its not like the particles coursing though your brain stop when a question arises and asks you what you want to do and then continue on after you make a decision, thats not how it works.. instead everything is dictated by the particles in the physical world and there's no way for us to insert our selves into it to change anything, it feels as if we are the true authors of our on actions but that is an illusion. instead the real reality is that we are just a bag of particles governed by the nature of the physical world (quantum mechanics & general relativity) so really you shouldn't be mad at a me, instead you should blame the particles?.. blame phsycis, blame nature because thats the real root of this problem.. no one makes choices, the particles just follow the probability of physics and that is that. Dear Image Thief, sorry I meant Conor, I must admit, your response is truly fascinating in its absurdity. Blaming particles for your actions is quite a creative approach. It seems you have convinced yourself that you are merely a helpless bag (which I'm sure you are) of particles, devoid of any free will or agency. But let me offer you a counterpoint, infused with a touch of rationality (if you're unfamiliar with the concept, feel free to send me a private message, as it might be a novel idea for you). While it is true that we are composed of particles and governed by the laws of physics, to reduce our existence to a mere deterministic interplay of atoms would be an oversimplification. You see, dear thief, the intricate dance of particles within your brain does indeed shape your thoughts, but it does not preclude the existence of consciousness or the ability to make choices. Consider this: your argument itself is a product of those very particles in your brain, particles that allow you to engage in intellectual ( or rather, in your case, less-than-intellectual) discourse and form opinions. It is the complexity of these interactions, the emergent properties of neural networks, that grant us the remarkable capacity for reflection and self-awareness. To suggest that you are not responsible for your actions and should instead blame the particles is an attempt to absolve yourself of personal accountability. It's akin to[b] [/b] blaming a paintbrush for a poorly executed artwork, instead of acknowledging the role of the artist's skill and intention. So, my dear particle-driven thief, while it may be tempting to hide behind the facade of determinism and evade responsibility for your actions, remember that it is your consciousness, your ability to reason, that grants you the capacity to distinguish right from wrong. Blaming particles for your deeds is a wimpy excuse and, it reveals a reluctance to take ownership of your choices. Next time you contemplate committing such acts, I implore you to consider the power of personal agency and the moral implications of your actions. With a hint of pity for your misguided worldview, every Astrophotgrapher that has a bit of dignity
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
@Salvatore IoveneIt's funny when we search for him on Instagram, I and my family and friends don't find him anymore :-) I really can't explain why that is. I was so happy that he was finally gone  Simone
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
This was posted on another forum on the same topic:
Hello everyone!
We run AstroCreditHunters on Instagram and we’re the ones that started exposing Conor Woods. If anyone recognizes their images on his page, please do not confront him before you report. We have a “pinned” guide on our Instagram for how to report these accounts. You have to report the post, not the overall account. Follow our guide and Instagram will remove the image from his account. If after you’ve reported the post you want to send him a message, feel free but he does just block anyone that does so. Please reach out if you need any help. We’ve been dealing with his account for a while now. Several images have been removed, but unfortunately his account is still growing over 10K. He bought a blue check mark as well.
-3SistersAstronomy
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
The fact that there exists a pinned guide on how to report this, and somebody like the people behind AstroCreditHunters who spends time exporins these frauds, makes me wonder if this isn't a bigger problem than I thought, and if I should do something to improve proof of ownership on AstroBin (hidden digital signatures, NFTs, something I haven't investigated yet).
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
The question is what is possible. I think it is almost impossible to completely prevent the stealing of pictures, but maybe it can be made more difficult, but I don't know enough about it.
Of course, if someone like Conor plays games like this, it's generally really difficult to do something about it. It was possible for me to delete the pictures on other accounts, one was insightful and the other one was deleted by Insta. I assume that Coner had deleted his account himself and had now reactivated it again. This also works on Instagram. You can also deactivate it or delete it. If you delete it, it will remain for 3 months and it can be reactivated during this time. Allso the guy makes fun of the whole thing.
I think there only helps a lawyer from someone whose picture was stolen from him.
Simone
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Salvatore Iovene:
The fact that there exists a pinned guide on how to report this, and somebody like the people behind AstroCreditHunters who spends time exporins these frauds, makes me wonder if this isn't a bigger problem than I thought, and if I should do something to improve proof of ownership on AstroBin (hidden digital signatures, NFTs, something I haven't investigated yet). Hello Salvatore! Our family (3SistersAstronomy) is behind AstroCreditHunters. I definitely think some preventative actions could help. However, I want you to know it is not just Astrobin. If you look through the screenshots I provided earlier, people are stealing from Flickr, Twitter, Reddit, and other websites. You are doing a great job over here! If you do implement some features, that would be great. We will keep trying to help from our end. -3SistersAstronomy (also AstroCreditHunters)
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
I'd suggest making full res pictures only available to paying members as the default setting on AB.
Perhaps even add an optional setting that allows full res pics to only be viewed by someone's followers.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Arun H:
I'd suggest making full res pictures only available to paying members as the default setting on AB. This is not the default, but you can do it in your image's settings. Arun H:
Perhaps even add an optional setting that allows full res pics to only be viewed by someone's followers. At the moment I'm not sure this would help: followers cannot be approved, so the bad actor could just follow you and there's nothing you can do about it... something that needs to be improved for sure!
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
An effective prove of ownership could be, by creating an individual private key for each AB account automatically. With that you can sign invisibly any image with owner, date of upload and more meta information during upload automatically. For more security you can salt it additionally during upload This could be easily verified with an AB public key from everyone. Any infringement could be proven by anyone at anytime.
This „seal“ can only be destroyed by massive image manipulation, which actually destroys also the image too.
This is not solving the root problem but makes infringements visible, easy to track and may deter such criminals and makes a law suite (in worst case) more likely to win.
CS
Rüdiger
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Ruediger:
An effective prove of ownership could be, by creating an individual private key for each AB account automatically. With that you can sign invisibly any image with owner, date of upload and more meta information during upload automatically. For more security you can salt it additionally during upload This could be easily verified with an AB public key from everyone. Any infringement could be proven by anyone at anytime.
This „seal“ can only be destroyed by massive image manipulation, which actually destroys also the image too.
This is not solving the root problem but makes infringements visible, easy to track and may deter such criminals and makes a law suite (in worst case) more likely to win.
CS
Rüdiger I had something like this in mind, but what's stopping a bad actor from screenshotting your image and pehaps slightly cropping or editing it and claiming it as their own? We'd be back at square zero, and the cryptographic solution is not much better than the publication date on AstroBin to prove that yours was first. Could there be a way to alter the value of certain pixels to a value in accordance to that cryptographic key? Or adding a fake artificial star somewhere that would be impossible to detect otherwise?
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Salvatore Iovene:
The fact that there exists a pinned guide on how to report this, and somebody like the people behind AstroCreditHunters who spends time exporins these frauds, makes me wonder if this isn't a bigger problem than I thought, and if I should do something to improve proof of ownership on AstroBin (hidden digital signatures, NFTs, something I haven't investigated yet). I am honestly think that that would be a waste of time. For me the proof is the documented time of the upload here on astrobin. most of the work on astrobin (if not all) is worth nothing (monetary). The only worth for me is in the knowledge that i created that picture and as impressively documented by this thread there is no doubt about who is the owner of the picture. i guess that it will be somewhat of an impossible task to stop anonymous people on the net to copy our work. But as long as we can proof that it is ours there is at least nobody making money with it.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Salvatore Iovene:
Ruediger:
An effective prove of ownership could be, by creating an individual private key for each AB account automatically. With that you can sign invisibly any image with owner, date of upload and more meta information during upload automatically. For more security you can salt it additionally during upload This could be easily verified with an AB public key from everyone. Any infringement could be proven by anyone at anytime.
This „seal“ can only be destroyed by massive image manipulation, which actually destroys also the image too.
This is not solving the root problem but makes infringements visible, easy to track and may deter such criminals and makes a law suite (in worst case) more likely to win.
CS
Rüdiger
I had something like this in mind, but what's stopping a bad actor from screenshotting your image and pehaps slightly cropping or editing it and claiming it as their own? We'd be back at square zero, and the cryptographic solution is not much better than the publication date on AstroBin to prove that yours was first.
Could there be a way to alter the value of certain pixels to a value in accordance to that cryptographic key? Or adding a fake artificial star somewhere that would be impossible to detect otherwise? You can place the watermark everywhere in the image - also redundant. It is not required to put it always in the same place. There are different ways to make these seals temper resistant, but of course only to certain extend. But usually you will find traces. I cannot comment on the latest developments, but it was already feasible more than 15 years ago in very small images (e.g. 800x600). So I assume that there are many ready to use libraries with much more powerful features.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Unless you want to be training AI-based web scraping bots to look for copyright infringement (pretty sure this is done quite a bit out there) any screenshotting will defeat most pixel based keys or patterns (since they'll simply be reading the display, not the core image)
What about some level of pattern recognition on user behavior within AB? An alert based on a combination of factors (IP region + only downloads Hi-res) ?
Does anyone know if Meta or other social sites do any copyright scanning on upload of images? maybe there's something that could be done there?
I've been around cybersecurity for a long time, and I don't think there's a consistent way to prevent this type of stealing without destroying the ease of access that really is necessary for the site to thrive. Generally the same kind of protections are done with png files that are trademarked. Any real protection of them requires a ton of resources and they still have issues. In most cases, good old legal action is the most effective I've seen. (no one likes a formal cease and desist letter)
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Arun H:
I'd suggest making full res pictures only available to paying members as the default setting on AB.
Perhaps even add an optional setting that allows full res pics to only be viewed by someone's followers. No need for full res images on Instagram.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Nick Grundy:
Unless you want to be training AI-based web scraping bots to look for copyright infringement (pretty sure this is done quite a bit out there) any screenshotting will defeat most pixel based keys or patterns (since they'll simply be reading the display, not the core image)
What about some level of pattern recognition on user behavior within AB? An alert based on a combination of factors (IP region + only downloads Hi-res) ?
Does anyone know if Meta or other social sites do any copyright scanning on upload of images? maybe there's something that could be done there?
I've been around cybersecurity for a long time, and I don't think there's a consistent way to prevent this type of stealing without destroying the ease of access that really is necessary for the site to thrive. Generally the same kind of protections are done with png files that are trademarked. Any real protection of them requires a ton of resources and they still have issues. In most cases, good old legal action is the most effective I've seen. (no one likes a formal cease and desist letter) Yes , they do scans. Like YouTube does too e.g. for music and other content. They are mainly AI based. But they only check against publicly know copyright holders like music labels. AB (and it’s users) will never be considered. You are definitely right. For any serious person intending professional fraud, this is no obstacle. But is this the aim of the game? I’d say no! I think you will cover almost all attempts by an easy approach. Have a look on this nasty guy. He is not very clever. I don’t expect him to train a neural network to remove specific AB seals. If he would be capable of, he could create such images himself. Less effort for him for sure. IT security is always about raising the effort for the black heats to make you unattractive compared to the gains 😉 Therefore I vote to keep the counter measure adequate and get the max risk reduction with the least effort. Or accept the remaining risk. Both are valid options. But there will always be a way to bypass any protective measure. The past 20 years have proven it undoubtedly. CS Rüdiger
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Ruediger:
An effective prove of ownership could be, by creating an individual private key for each AB account automatically. With that you can sign invisibly any image with owner, date of upload and more meta information during upload automatically. For more security you can salt it additionally during upload This could be easily verified with an AB public key from everyone. Any infringement could be proven by anyone at anytime.
This „seal“ can only be destroyed by massive image manipulation, which actually destroys also the image too.
This is not solving the root problem but makes infringements visible, easy to track and may deter such criminals and makes a law suite (in worst case) more likely to win.
CS
Rüdiger Just as a short follow up: I have made a very quick and dirty POC and packed an AES128 encrypted payload text in one of my images in order to test feasibility. I have cropped it to 600px, which is sufficient for this test. The payload text is: "I have uploaded this file on AstroBin on 23.05.2023 User: Ruediger" Tool used "OpenStego" Source: https://www.openstego.com/1. original image 2. seeded image 3. Diff image in PI with PM 4. Diff image extremely stretched. Conclusion: You can seed the (Astro-) images with tons of information without being noticed by human eyes. For this test a relative sensitive coding algorithm was chosen, which gets easily corrupted when the image gets modified. By choosing a different method or putting multiple times, this can be avoided. But for a POC it looks promising.     |
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
Ruediger:
I have made a very quick and dirty POC and packed an AES128 encrypted payload text in one of my images in order to test feasibility. I have cropped it to 600px, which is sufficient for this test. The payload text is:
"I have uploaded this file on AstroBin on 23.05.2023
User: Ruediger" What editing operation is the hidden information going to survive? If you open it in Photoshop or Gimp or anything, and mess with it (crop / change curves / etc) at which point is the information lost, if any?
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.
This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.
To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.
