

![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
There shouldn't be anything there. So either is an artifact or is a discovery.
|
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Might be a new faraway supernova; I don't think that was there before.
|
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
For example, there is nothing like that in that area of the Witch shown in this top pick https://www.astrobin.com/5bfryz/B/?q=witch%20head&camera= from 19 days ago. If anyone is interested, these are all the Witch Heads taken in the last month https://www.astrobin.com/search/?q=witch+head&d=i&subject=&telescope=&camera=&date_published_min=2023-11-05&date_published_max=2023-12-05&sort=. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Thanks - I really think it is an artifact, especially because I could see it move around a little bit as I blink through the subs. If it were a deep-space object I would expect it to maintain a constant position among the nearby stars. On the other hand, I think if were something in our solar system like an asteroid or object in earth orbit, it would move through the star field in a constant direction. It does not have the central brightness that I would expect of a supernova. I am just really curious about what type of artifact would look like this one. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
The bright star next to the whichhead might cause lensflaring in your telescope. If you dither it should move around a little bit. but it does look weird, not very flare like.
|