AstroBin

AstroBin

AstroBin

New Telescope of Focuser? Generic equipment discussions · Craig Holbrook · ... · 8 · 359 · 0

Holbunch 0.00
Craig Holbrook
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
UPDATE:
I do have the EAF on this set up to let those know. I forgot to list that. I was more worried about the tube angle since it was sagging in the scope.
I also have since posting this in the forum have purchased a new telescope:
Askar 65PHQ


I will start out with why I am asking this question. I have currently upgraded my imaging system to the QHY 533M camera, QHY Filer wheel and QHY OAG. I did so for 2 reasons. I wanted to dive into the world of Mono imaging and number 2, get rid of the dreaded AMP GLOW from my old ZWO 183MC (uncooled).  
I used the 183MC with a ZWO filter on my old scope with what appeared to be little issue as far as weight went. With my new imaging system is quite apparent that there is a large issue. 
I currently us Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED with the .85 reducer. Let's face it, the focuser on this thing is weak at best. Scope is a doublet but with reducer/flattener it really hasn't performed too  bad. Stepping into mono I think I want to get something that is still wide field, maybe doesn't need to have a flattener and produces good color so I don't get halos. 
I currently us a EQ6R-Pro mount that is mounted on a cement pier in my backyard inside a small shed(observatory). 

Question here is:
1.) Do I just upgrade the focuser on my 72ED? approx. $500
or
2.) Purchase a Quad or Petzval?

Key is I want something with a good focuser that I can attatch my EAF to also. That's gonna last for wide field.

Thanks in advance,

Craig
Edited ...
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
ejsengineer 2.39
Ethan Sweet
...
· 
·  4 likes
·  Share link
IMO putting a $500 focuser on a $380 telescope just seems like putting lipstick on a pig. Your first two images are excellent with it however!

Personally, I'd sell the doublet and take those proceeds along with the $500 you planned on spending on the focuser and put it towards the Askar 65PHQ or ZWO 65FF ($899). Same focal length you have now but a Petzval design.

I just shoot with a Canon lens and DLSR at the moment so take what I say with a grain of salt.

I can't find any complaints on this scope however, and it is going to be my next purchase. Just my 2cents.  

CS!
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
messierman3000 7.22
Oscar
...
· 
·  2 likes
·  Share link
Yeah, 65PHQ is good, it's super sharp, and well performing for the price; the stock focuser on the 65phq is already very sturdy - it doesn't tilt even with my heavy image train (2600mm-p, 2x7 EFW, 7 filters, OAG)

only con is it's F/6.4, which is on the slower side IMO (not really slow, but if you plan on making discoveries and stuff, or going for the faintest of PNs, good luck)
Edited ...
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
Gondola 8.11
Tony Gondola
...
· 
·  2 likes
·  Share link
I don't know, it's sooooo easy to spend money in this hobby to fix problems. If you're happy with the imaging performance I would first, see if there any way to can improve the performance of the stock focuser. I've had an evolux 62 and the focuser wasn't that bad. After that, and I haven't researched this but perhaps you can find a cheaper replacement focuser that will work for you? Also, is there any way you can lighten the weight of the imaging train? What kind of performance do you get without the reducer-flattener in this BX world?
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
TiffsAndAstro 1.81
TiffsAndAstro
...
· 
·  Share link
Craig Holbrook:
I will start out with why I am asking this question. I have currently upgraded my imaging system to the QHY 533M camera, QHY Filer wheel and QHY OAG. I did so for 2 reasons. I wanted to dive into the world of Mono imaging and number 2, get rid of the dreaded AMP GLOW from my old ZWO 183MC (uncooled).  
I used the 183MC with a ZWO filter on my old scope with what appeared to be little issue as far as weight went. With my new imaging system is quite apparent that there is a large issue. 
I currently us Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED with the .85 reducer. Let's face it, the focuser on this thing is weak at best. Scope is a doublet but with reducer/flattener it really hasn't performed too  bad. Stepping into mono I think I want to get something that is still wide field, maybe doesn't need to have a flattener and produces good color so I don't get halos. 
I currently us a EQ6R-Pro mount that is mounted on a cement pier in my backyard inside a small shed(observatory). 

Question here is:
1.) Do I just upgrade the focuser on my 72ED? approx. $500
or
2.) Purchase a Quad or Petzval?

Key is I want something with a good focuser that I can attatch my EAF to also. That's gonna last for wide field.

Thanks in advance,

Craig


I too have 72ed with the flattener. I think it's slightly non standard so not really a way to replace the focuser?

It might be possible to tweak the screws on the focuser to improve it.

Mine seems fine with my own 533colour camera, but previously using a canon 600d there was some tilt or slop. Probably both ;)

I would look into tweaking those control screws it might be possible to make it good enough for a small sensor.
Edited ...
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
dostergaard 0.00
Dean Ostergaard
...
· 
·  Share link
I considered replacing the focuser on my Explore Scientific AR102 but in the end came to the same conclusion as @Ethan Sweet above except for the scope choice.

I ended up buying the Founder Optics Draco 62 Quintuplet for wide field astrophotography and don't regret it.

It comes with a 0.83x reducer that installs right into the focuser draw tube without increasing the overall OTA tube length.

300mm, f/4.8 native
249mm, f/3.9 with 0.83x reducer

When you add in the cost of a reducer to the Askar 65PHQ or ZWO 65FF you're in the same ballpark price-wise.

At the moment it seems I am only one of two users of this scope on AstroBin but I love using it. I really don't understand why it isn't more popular.
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
NeilM 2.11
NeilM
...
· 
·  Share link
Have you considered adding an autofocuser?  The gearing should hold the focus setting in place unless it’s very heavy.  Then you can set the focus step to be small to give you accurate focusing adjustments. The good news is that if you later upgrade your scope you can take the autofocuser to that scope - so no loss of money!
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
sgthebert 2.81
Médéric Hébert
...
· 
·  1 like
·  Share link
+1 for adding an autofocuser, You can't move the focuser by hand (or gravity) with it installed
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
deepanvishal 4.06
Deepan Vishal
...
· 
·  Share link
Hi,

Your images are looking nice. Third party focusers are nice. But I’d not take the trouble to find one for this scope. 

I see you did your research on Quads and Petzvals. 

One widefield scope I like is Sharpstar 61 edphii. It is a triplet and has a good focuser. It is not perfect, but good enough. I got it cheap in used market. If you’re willing to look at the used items in the marketplace / cloudynights and astromart, you might find good items which will cost you just as much as the focuser.
Like
×

Sorry :-(

Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
×

Share this forum post

Copy the URL below to share a direct link to this post.

Close
×

Post editing not available

This post cannot be edited using the classic forums editor.

To edit this post, please enable the "New forums experience" in your settings.

Go to Settings Close
 
Register or login to create to post a reply.
×

Warning!

This operation will reload the current page. If you have any unsaved information in a form, it will be lost.

You can also dismiss this window, and your operation will be applied at the next page navigation.