![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Hi everyone I ask for opinions on the use of scnr. Especially in the deepsky field with images of galaxies with sky background. many apply scnr at 100% after the color calibration has been performed, in this way however the sky background becomes purple due to the reduction of the green contribution. I don't think this mode is the most correct I currently use a luminance mask in order to perform a 100% scnr only on galaxies and stars and I perform a reduced scnr to have a uniform sky background median between the 3 colors. in your opinion is it the correct way? How would you do it? CS Riccardo |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
2
likes
|
---|
I'd use SCNR in the same way that I'd cheat on my wife. Never. It's a destructive process that ruins your image (That goes for both ends of the analogy). Simply put you shouldn't use SCNR if your SNR is high enough, as it will degrade actual pixel data that is present, you should just take the green channel and tone its mid-band back a little bit, then recalibrate the background. |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
50% to 20%. No need to apply a luminance mask (which I wouldn't have anyway, most of the times). But I'm shooting OSCs so a green background is kinda expected.
|
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
I'd use SCNR in the same way that I'd cheat on my wife. Never. This. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
….what is SCNR?
|
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Tony Gondola: If you end up getting PI, it's a tool that tries to remove green. |