![]() ...
·
![]()
·
2
likes
|
---|
I recently came across the 'Cosmic Clarity' software from Seti Astro (cosmic clarity — Seti Astro). This is a freely-available tool that provides AI-based sharpening and noise reduction features for astronomy images. Usefully for those of us that haven't made the transition to PI, it comes in a standalone version although a PI integration is also available. My initial impressions are quite favourable, although I had to dial down both the sharpening and noise-reduction levels from their defaults to minimise artefacts. There does seem to be a slight tendency to 'invent' stars from clumps of luminosity in DSO images, although reducing the sharpening level does reduce this. The tools also seem to increase saturation and mess with colour balance a bit, although both effects are easily handled with a quick curve adjustment after processing. I've posted a couple of examples where I've reprocessed some of my earlier images: NGC5189 - the Spiral Planetary Nebula (James Tickner) - AstroBin Centaurus A (Caldwell 77, NGC 5128) (James Tickner) - AstroBin In both cases significant extra detail can be seen, and comparison with images taken with larger scopes/Hubble suggest that this is 'real'. All-in-all, worth a look as a free alternative. I'd be interested to hear of others' experiences as well. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
I've been experimenting with it and results are good. I do a lot of these things in other ways but it's always nice to have options. I do wish it would work directly with FITS files and not just 32 bit tiff. It also didn't seem to work with monochrome images and the way you have to work with it is, clunky.. Still, it seems like a very worthwhile tool and, you can't beat free so hats off to Seti Astro for putting this out.
|
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Tony Gondola: It does work with monochrome images. And the latest version is also able to work with images in their linear state, which streamlines things a bit. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Interesting, I'll have to try that again.
|
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
I am using Topaz Lab Denoise AI and it is incredibly powerful. The only problem is that my computer is hardly up to the task, because processing the images is quite heavy ! Philippe |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
I use it too. It's nice for putting a gentle final polish on images. Apparently, the latest version of Topaz is really awful and heavy-handed but the older version that you can't get anymore is much more usable. Even then, it takes a lot of tuning.
|
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Philippe Barraud: The biggest issue Topaz Lab has is that it creates false detail in images, because its AI is generative in design. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
It can if you don't keep it under control. There is a control that's called "recover original detail" that tames that tendency a lot. You just have to be very careful with it. Overall, I find that for straight noise reduction, GraXpert works really well. I don't care for it's background extraction results though.
|