Has anyone ever played around with correcting the RGB channels of an image to compensate for red-shift?
Sometimes I get bored and come up with weird ideas.

-Crimsus
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
I had a crazy thought the other day. Has anyone ever played around with correcting the RGB channels of an image to compensate for red-shift? Sometimes I get bored and come up with weird ideas. ![]() -Crimsus |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
I had a crazy thought the other day. are amateurs even capable of taking images of stuff so distant that red shift is an issue? using NB Ha filter, the shift would move it outside of the filters bandpass so it would be blocked anyhow? Still an interesting question though. |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
TiffsAndAstro:I had a crazy thought the other day. Actually - if you use an SII filter then you can pick up HA in the coma cluster - shift ca 16 nm - so it is possible with thought but would have to be tailored for different objects at different recessional distances? |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
2
likes
|
---|
Tim Hawkes: Actually I worked in Space Command for 10 years working on hyper-spectral satellite systems. I didn't mean my question to sound like an amateur. I was just keeping it casual. I'm talking about something like an image taken by an RGB camera, but in post, adjusting the colors to represent their true wavelength based on the red-shift. I left filters out since the filters can't account for red-shift, plus the bandpass for each channel would have to be pretty generous so the light we want doesn't get filtered out. The filters would be more of a hindrance than helpful. Capturing the light without a filter would give any adjustments to the channels ample room so nothing gets lost. The challenge is finding a target that can be captured that is far enough away, but not too far. The rest is simple math to calculate the red-shift and adjusting the channels accordingly. -Crimsus |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
Tim Hawkes: I would love a CV with something called space command on it ![]() been a while but 1 billion light years is about 0.08? But, maybe redshifted gamma rays from black hole emissions? Would need to be very distant to shift them down to visible light ranged and probably far too weak. I'll leave this to pros like yourself on here, but this is still a very interesting idea. |
![]() ...
·
![]()
·
1
like
|
---|
TiffsAndAstro: Roland Christen imaged the Einstein cross with his 10" maksutov, so yes it is possible. Many distant galaxies, quasars and Einstein rings within grasp of amateur scopes, many images of them right here on AstroBin. It's on my to-do list, but I need more practice before I attempt one of these with mine. I never cease to be amazed at what's possible with the current gear, compared to when I started 50 years ago. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
The answer is yes there are objects with big redshifts within the grasp of amateur scopes. One example is a quasar recently discovered at 13B light years which looks like a boring dim orange star - at magnitude 16 - until someone measured its spectrum and realised its not a star at all. https://www.ndtv.com/science/brightest-known-object-in-the-universe-was-hiding-in-plain-sight-for-decades-study-5135352/amp/1 The challenge however is whether amateur scopes are capable of doing spectroscopy on such targets with sufficient spectral resolution to measure the redshift. That’s a whole different challenge and I suspect the answer is no. |
![]() ...
·
![]() |
---|
For objects that are close enough to show significant detail in typical amateur apertures, I suspect that it really wouldn't matter much.
|